Anilina Fabrique de Colorants v. Aakash Chemicals & Dyestuffs, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
856 F.2d 873 · 1988
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably Lorenzen v. Employees Retirement Plan of the Sperry & Hutchinson Co. (1990), Goldman, Antonetti, Ferraiuoli, Axtmayer & Hertell v. Medfit International, Inc. (1993)
27 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. Rogers · Roemer v. United States · Waldschmidt v. Ranier · Hunter v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that all substantive motions served within 10 days of the entry of a judgment will be treated as based on Rule 59, and therefore as tolling the time for appeal.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Rule 55 provides that after judgment has been entered, a default may be set aside 'in accordance with Rule 60(b),' Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(c); thus Rule 60(b) controls motions in which relief from a judgment or order may be sought.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“A defense is meritorious if it is good at law so as to give the factfinder some determination to make.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.