Webb v. Exxon Mobil Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
856 F.3d 1150 · 2017
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 2020
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 49 U.S.C. § 60101 (Accountable Pipeline Safety and Partnership Act of 1996)
Relies on Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor · General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon · Califano v. Yamasaki · East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. Rodriguez · Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that the questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members, and that a class action is superior to other available methods for fairly and efficiently adjudicating the controversy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“one of the three subsections of Rule 23(b).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.