Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 856 F.3d 1177 - Dooley v. Tharp

Dooley v. Tharp’s Empirical Analysis

856 F.3d 1177 · 2017

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 2023
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Graham v. Connor · Pearson v. Callahan · Scott v. Harris · Duncan v. Walker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “view[ing] the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs and draw[ing] all reasonable inferences in their favor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Before employing deadly force, an officer should give some warning when it is feasible to do so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.