United States v. Berroa’s Empirical Analysis
856 F.3d 141 · 2017
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1028A · 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1344 · 18 U.S.C. § 1346 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on Bailey v. United States · Liteky et al United States · McNally v. United States · Russell v. United States · Schmuck v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In light of § 1028A's legislative history, as well as the limitless nature of the government's alternative construction, we read the term 'use' to require that the defendant attempt to pass him or herself off as another person or purport to take some other action on another person's behalf.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“infringe on the states' 'distinctively sovereign authority to impose criminal penalties for violations of' licensing schemes, 'including making false statements in a license application.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Trial courts have the ability to grant immunity to a witness upon a showing that the government's refusal to provide said immunity violated the defendant's due process rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.