Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 856 FSUPP 1095 - Cook v. Espy

Cook v. Espy’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
July 1997
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 7 U.S.C. § 2014 · 7 U.S.C. § 2020

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Udall v. Tallman · Chemical Manufacturers Association v. Natural Resources Defense Council Inc · Nebraska v. Wyoming

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, it will be evaluated to determine if it is exempt as an income producer or as a home. If not exempt, it will be evaluated to determine if its fair market value exceeds $4,500. If worth more than $4,500, the portion in excess of $4,500 for each vehicle will be counted as a resource. The vehicle will also be evaluated to see if it is equity exempt as the household’s only vehicle or necessary for employment reasons. If not equity exempt, the equity value will be counted as a resource. If the vehicle has a countable market value of more than $4,500 and also a countable equity value, only the greater of the two amounts shall be counted as a resource.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “To sustain the agency’s interpretation, we need not find that it is the only permissible construction which the agency might have adopted or that it is the interpretation which we would have reached on our own, but only that the agency’s understanding is sufficiently rational to preclude a court from substituting its own judgment for that of the agency. Indeed, if an agency charged with a statute’s enforcement interprets the statute’s textual ambiguities in such a way as to accommodate conflicting policies reasonably, a court must not disturb the agency’s interpretation unless it runs counter to the statutory language or the legislative history.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A resource shall be so identified if its sale or other disposition is unlikely to produce any significant amount of funds for the support of the household....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.