856 F. Supp. 2d 104 - Marshall v. I-Flow, LLC’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 1404
Relies on Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug Administration · Reuber v. United States · Crane v. New York Zoological Society · Second Amendment Foundation v. United States Conference of Mayors · 944 F. Supp. 13 - Trout Unlimited v. United States Department of Agriculture
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Defendant has established and benefits from a partnership with the George Washington University Hospital, devotes an entire sales region to sales in Washington, D.C., profits from sales ... to every major Washington, D.C. Hospital, and has obtained expert medical consulting services of prominent Washington, D.C. medical facilities and physicians.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.