Prickett v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently October 2021
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blakely v. Washington · Sherwood Partners, Inc. v. Lycos, Inc. · Sunbeam Products, Inc. v. Wing Shing Products (BVI) Ltd. · United States v. Reifler · Kratzer v. Rockwell Collins, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[The significance of a defendant's prior criminal history in determining whether to impose a sentence enhancement will vary 'based on the gravity, nature and number of prior offenses as they relate to the current offense”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Howell v. State“was neither sufficiently similar to the instant offense nor weighty enough to warrant consideration as an aggravating factor in enhancing his Class A felony sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Howell v. State“[wJhile recognizing that a defendant's criminal history can be a valid aggravating cireumstance, we find that it is of little weight in the instant case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Howell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.