Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 856 NE2D 1231 - Brinkman v. Bueter

Brinkman v. Bueter’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 2008
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Martin v. Richey · AutoXchange. Com, Inc. v. Dreyer and Reinbold, Inc. · Benefiel v. State · Van Dusen v. Stotts · Havens v. Ritchey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The panel is of the unanimous opinion that the evidence does not support the conclusion that James F. Dupler, M.D. failed to meet the applicable standard of care. With regard to defendant, Anne P. Bueter, M.D., the panel is of the unanimous opinion that there is a material issue of fact, not requiring expert opinion, bearing on liability for consideration by the court or jury. The panel also is of the unanimous opinion that the evidence supports the conclusion that defendant, Women’s Health Partnership, failed to comply with the appropriate standard of care, and that its conduct was a factor of the resultant damages.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A claim, whether in contract or tort, may not be brought against a health care provider based upon professional services or health care that was provided or that should have been provided unless the claim is filed within two (2) years after the date of the alleged act, omission, or neglect....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.