Taylor v. Hynson’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably Schovanec v. Archdiocese of Oklahoma City (2008), Bowers v. Wimberly (1997)
4 federal appellate · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lay v. Dworman · McMillin v. Barton-Robison Convoy Co. · Rogers v. Hennessee · Aycock v. Harriman · Davis v. Allied Supermarkets, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that the acts of the third person are occurring, or are about to occur.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“[the invitor will not be responsible for injury unless the invitor has notice or could be charged with gaining knowledge of the situation in time to remove it or to give warning of its presence.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“An invitor is not an insurer of the safety of others and is not required to prevent all injury occurring on the property ... An invitor does not have a duty to protect invitees from criminal assaults by third persons, ... unless the invitor knows or has reason to know that the acts of the third person are occurring, or are about to occur.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.