¶1The appellant challenges the revocation of his probation, where the court did not indicate which particular conditions were violated. Because this is required under cases such as Rogers v. State, 635 So.2d 1026 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), the appealed orders are reversed and the case is remanded for entry of a written order specifying the conditions which the court found to have been violated. See also, e.g., Jones v. State, 638 So.2d 126 (Fla. 1st DCA *11091994); Brundage v. State, 598 So.2d 1227 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).
856 So. 2d 1108
Hutchinson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 22, 2003
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2003-10-22
Relies on 638 So. 2d 126 - Jones v. State · 598 So. 2d 1226 - Melendreras v. Blanchard · Rogers v. State
Decided 2003-10-22