In Re Van Sharp’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
March 2009
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In Re Marullo · In re Brass · 713 So. 2d 1138 - In Re Harris · 815 So. 2d 813 - In Re Shea · 683 So. 2d 1214 - In Re Tuck
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“La. Sup.Ct. Rule G, § 2(b), which requires judges to report the status of cases pending beyond the established time period, was intended to provide a system of accountability and to promote the orderly and expeditious disposition of all matters submitted to a judge. It is imperative that those responsible for administering the judicial system be furnished this information timely. Therefore, we view the reporting requirement as a necessary duty, which we expect to be followed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“A judge shall respect and comply with the law....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.