Buskirk v. Elliott’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 799 So. 2d 1 - Whitten v. Cox · 617 So. 2d 248 - Sperry-New Holland v. Prestage · 697 So. 2d 373 - Steele v. Inn of Vicksburg, Inc. · Murphy v. Magnolia Electric Power Ass'n · 688 So. 2d 1385 - Pierce v. Heritage Properties, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“On the other hand if there is substantial evidence in support of the verdict, that is, evidence of such quality and weight that reasonable and fair minded jurors in the exercise of impartial judgment might have reached different conclusions, affirmance is required.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“If the facts so considered point so overwhelmingly in favor of the appellant that reasonable men could not have arrived at a contrary verdict, we are required to reverse and render.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“state the subject matter on which the expert is expected to testify, and to state the substance of the facts and opinions to which the expert is expected to testify and a summary of the grounds for each opinion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.