Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 856 So. 2d 267 - Goodin v. State

856 So. 2d 267 - Goodin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2019

12 state decisions

12020032010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Neil v. Biggers · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden · Ring v. Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The essential feature of Mental Retardation is significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning (Criterion A) that is accompanied by significant limitations in adaptive functioning in at least two of the following skill areas: communication, self-care, home living, social/interpersonal skills, use of community resources, self-direction, functional academic skills, work, leisure, health, and safety (Criterion B). The onset must occur before age 18 years (Criterion C). Mental Retardation has many different etiologies and may be seen as a final common pathway of various pathological processes that affect the functioning of the central nervous system.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “leave [s] to the State[s] the task of developing appropriate ways to enforce the constitutional restriction upon [their] execution of sentences.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “there is conflicting authority on whether this Court should apply the procedural bar”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.