Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 856 So. 2d 396 - Green v. State

856 So. 2d 396 - Green v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 2004
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Solem v. Helm · Lockyer Attorney General of California v. Andrade · 637 So. 2d 871 - Perry v. State · 684 So. 2d 643 - Davis v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On rehearing, Green now argues that his point actually included the related doctrine of lesser, non-included offense instructions. This doctrine is of fairly recent origin. In the case that created it, [ Griffin v. State ] the Court noted among the reasons for allowing an instruction on an offense that is not included within the charged offense but which arose out of the same operative facts, was "the enormous disparity in maximum punishments" in the two potential offenses....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) It shall be unlawful for any person to sell, produce, manufacture, or possess with the intent to sell, produce, manufacture, distribute or dispense any substance which is falsely represented to be a controlled substance or which is falsely represented to be a counterfeit substance....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.