Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 856 SO2D 426 - Richardson v. Richardson

Richardson v. Richardson’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 815 So. 2d 1117 - Miller v. Pannell · 835 So. 2d 52 - Bodne v. King

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The first alternative is to take the appel-lee’s failure to file a brief as a confession of error and reverse. This should be done when the record is complicated or of large volume and the case has been thoroughly briefed by the appellant with apt and applicable citation of authority so that the brief makes out an apparent case of error. The second alternative is to disregard the appellee’s error and affirm. This alternative should be used when the record can be conveniently examined and such examination reveals a sound and unmistakable basis or ground upon which the judgment may be safely affirmed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.