Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 856 So. 2d 518 - Mims v. State

856 So. 2d 518 - Mims v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · McClain v. State · 503 So. 2d 803 - Wetz v. State · 637 So. 2d 871 - Perry v. State · Jefferson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Unless good cause be shown, and a continuance duly granted by the court, all offenses for which indictments are presented to the court shall be tried no later than two hundred seventy (270) days after the accused has been arraigned.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Review of a speedy trial claim encompasses the fact question of whether the trial delay rose from good cause. Under this Court’s standard of review, this Court will uphold a decision based on substantial, credible evidence. If no probative evidence supports the trial court’s finding of good cause, this Court will ordinarily reverse. The State bears the burden of proving good cause for a speedy trial delay, and thus bears the risk of non-persuasion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Prejudice ... should be assessed in the light of the interests of defendants which the speedy trial right was designed to protect. This Court has identified three such interests: (i) to prevent oppressive pretrial incarceration; (ii) to minimize anxiety and concern of the ac cused; and (iii) to limit the possibility that the defense will be impaired.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.