Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 856 So. 2d 532 - Roberson v. State

856 So. 2d 532 - Roberson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Abney v. United States · Oregon v. Kennedy · Divans v. California · Jones v. State · 748 So. 2d 77 - State v. Blenden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In such circumstances, there is no double jeopardy defect in a new trial unless the governmental conduct in question is intended to 'goad' the defendant into asking for a mistrial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Generally, criminal defendants who request the mistrial are barred from subsequently asserting double jeopardy violations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.