856 So. 2d 56 - Patton v. Patton’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Loyacano v. Loyacano · 635 So. 2d 456 - Settle v. Settle · 644 So. 2d 733 - Fountain v. Fountain · Guillory v. Guillory · 756 So. 2d 639 - Carr v. Carr
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There cannot be an exact formula or rule for deciding whether and to what extent any depletion of assets is required of a spousal support claimant; rather, courts must apply a rule of reasonableness," in light of such factors as the value and liquidity of the assets, the ages and the mental and physical health of the parties, and their relative ability, education, and work experience. The problem is of such a nature as to be insusceptible of solution by any exact formula or monetary index, and the court should proceed with great caution and due regard for the probable long range effects of any depletion contemplated. (Citations omitted.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.