856 So. 2d 568 - Phillips v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2007
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 483 So. 2d 343 - Odom v. State · 754 So. 2d 519 - Mitchell v. State · 803 So. 2d 1282 - Shaw v. State · 461 F. Supp. 565 - United States v. Sine · Scott v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“our post-conviction relief statutes are available only to those serving a sentence for the crime for which they were convicted by a Mississippi court of record.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. State · Rice v. State“[p]risoner in custody under sentence of a court of record of the State of Mississippi . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.