856 So. 2d 587 - Edwards v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · 681 So. 2d 521 - Hoops v. State · 671 So. 2d 581 - Walker v. State · Evans v. State · Heidel v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Case law unequivocally holds that the trial judge is in the best position for determining the prejudicial effect of an objectionable remark. The judge is provided considerable discretion to determine whether the remark is so prejudicial that a mistrial should be declared. Where serious and irreparable damage has not resulted, the judge should admonish the jury then and there to disregard the impropriety.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“It is the appellant's duty to provide authority and support for the issues he presents.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.