856 So. 2d 6 - Olges v. Dougherty’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 509 So. 2d 1097 - Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savage · 658 So. 2d 646 - Parkway Bank v. FORT MYERS ARMATURE WORK · 720 So. 2d 214 - Jaye v. Royal Saxon, Inc. · 516 So. 2d 562 - Bell v. Hart · Lundgren v. Eustermann
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In the context of compelled physical or psychiatric examinations, the required element of irreparable harm may be found based on the notion that once the invasive harm of the examination occurs, it cannot be undone on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Vazquez v. Wendy's“But the question of protective rules or protective orders never arises and the burden never shifts unless the proponent of the examination shows good cause for an examination in the first place.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.