856 So. 2d 669 - Doolie v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 671 So. 2d 647 - Peterson v. State · 506 So. 2d 989 - Meshell v. State · 547 So. 2d 38 - Evans v. State · 753 So. 2d 489 - Ford v. State · 755 So. 2d 1199 - Harris v. Lewis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]n determining whether a jury verdict is against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, this Court must accept as true the evidence presented as supportive of the verdict, and we will disturb a jury verdict only when convinced that the circuit court has abused its discretion in failing to grant a new trial or if the final result will result in an unconscionable injustice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the jury is the judge of the weight and credibility of testimony and is free to accept or reject all or some of the testimony given by each witness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.