Harry v. Harry’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 516 So. 2d 485 - Culpepper v. State · 775 So. 2d 115 - KMK v. SLM Ex Rel. JH · 735 So. 2d 1002 - Esco v. Scott · 662 So. 2d 566 - Marshall v. State · 841 So. 2d 1062 - Tollison v. Tollison
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[j]urisdiction over the subject matter of a proceeding cannot be conferred by consent or waiver. Thus, subject matter jurisdiction may not be waived and may be asserted at any stage of the proceeding or even collaterally.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.