Ex Parte Hodges’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
54
cited by 54 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
April 2018
most recently cited
52 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · United States v. Young · United States v. Frady · Ring v. Arizona · Griffith v. Kentucky
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“used sparingly, solely in those circumstances in which a miscarriage of justice would otherwise result.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Townes v. State · Smith v. State“United States v. Atkinson , 297 U.S. [157], at 160 [ (1936) ]. In other words, the plain-error exception to the contemporaneous-objection rule is to be”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Townes v. State · Smith v. State“United States v. Frady , 456 U.S., at 163 , n. 14 .'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.