State v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
66 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably State v. Tokar (1996), State v. Silvey (1995)
66 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Batson v. Kentucky · Hernandez v. New York · Joseph v. United States · Porzig v. Nolden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is not necessary to determine the propriety of the prosecutor’s argument. Even assuming the argument was improper, a conviction will be reversed for improper argument only if it is established that the comment of which appellant complains had a decisive effect on the jury’s determination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Williams“a reasonable probability that counsel's error affected the outcome of the trial”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McClanahan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.