Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 856 SW2D 936 - Kirkland v. Todd

Kirkland v. Todd’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2000
most recently cited

1 district · 5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Murphy v. Carron · Spires v. Lawless · Citizens Bank of Smithville v. Lair · Higgins v. Deering Harvester Co. · 226 Mo. App. 869 - Missouri Finance Corp. v. Roos

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[T]he rule is so strict that the courts will not stop to inquire whether the alteration was injurious or beneficial to the surety. The reason is that contracts of suretyship are strictly construed in favor of the surety, and he has a right to stand upon the exact contract he made; and no one, not even a court can change it in any respect. ...””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.