Davis v. Puckett’s Empirical Analysis
857 F.2d 1035 · 1988
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently October 2013
17 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Edwards v. Arizona · Michigan v. Jackson · Smith v. Illinois · Connecticut v. Barrett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Having run the Barker balancing test, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err in determining that Davis failed to show that his Sixth Amendment rights were violated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In evaluating the factors, the district court was not clearly erroneous in deciding that Davis’s constitutional right to a speedy trial had not been violated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.