Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

857 F.2d 1469

Docket Nos. 87-1120, 87-1137.

Kinnard v. Alpert

Full caption · 4 consolidated cases

  • Charles KINNARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, and James Dean; James McIverv.Robert ALPERT; Hymen Alpert; Hy-Bob Company, Inc.; Middle Peninsula Northern Neck Savings and Loan Association; Mount Vernon Savings and Loan Association; Crossland Savings F.S.B.; Sidney Block, Defendants-Appellees, and Anne C. Evans; Alexander C. Short, Substitute Trustees; S
  • Block & Company; Susan Guarnieri, Dr., Director, Baltimore City Health Department; William Donald Schaefer, Mayor; Sophia Blockv.BALTIMORE TITLE COMPANY, INC.; Jerry Seaman Third Party
  • Charles KINNARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, and James Dean; James McIverv.Robert ALPERT; Hymen Alpert; Hy-Bob Company, Inc.; Middle Peninsula Northern Neck Savings and Loan Association; Sidney Block; Mount Vernon Savings and Loan Association; Crossland Savings F.S.B., Defendants-Appellees, and Anne C. Evans; Alexander C. Short, Substitute Trustees; S
  • Block & Company; Susan Guarnieri, Dr., Director, Baltimore City Health Department; William Donald Schaefer, Mayor; Sophia Blockv.BALTIMORE TITLE COMPANY, INC.; Jerry Seaman, Third Party

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued: July 8, 1988. Decided: Aug. 8, 1988.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1988-08-08

Relies on Jefferson v. Hopkins

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1988-08-08

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert E. Capel, Jr., for appellants.

Harvey H. Perritt, Jr. (Richard C. Deering & Associates, on brief); Howard J. Schulman; Richard A. Finci (Ronald B. Bergman, Pickett, Houlon & Bergman, on brief); Benjamin Lipsitz (Lipsitz & Lipsitz, on brief), for appellees.

Before HARRISON L. WINTER, Chief Judge, and MURNAGHAN and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

In a case complex rather than complicated, numerous issues were presented. After presentation by plaintiffs of their evidence at trial before a jury, the district court made findings and directed a verdict in favor of defendants. Involved were an issue of whether diversity jurisdiction existed, claims for rescission, assertions of breach of contract, breach of contract and warranty, negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, grounds for declaratory judgment alleged, and fraud was claimed. A review of the record discloses no viable grounds for challenging the district court's decision. Certainly neither clearly erroneous findings nor abuse of discretion were established.

The decision in favor of the defendants is

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/857/f2d/1469 · .json · Public domain