Whidbee v. Pierce County’s Empirical Analysis
857 F.3d 1019 · 2017
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1448 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Wilson v. Garcia · Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc. · 109 Wash. 2d 107 - Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply System · State v. Garcia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[E]ven if a claim has expired under a state statute of limitations, a defendant can still waive this affirmative defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.