Cierco v. Mnuchin’s Empirical Analysis
857 F.3d 407 · 2017
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 31 U.S.C. § 5318A (§ 311 of the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001) · 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946)
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Allen v. Wright · Friends of the Earth Incorporateds v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“interim relief or events have completely and irrevocably eradicated the effects of the alleged violation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“demonstrating that there is no reasonable expectation that the wrong will be repeated.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the unfettered choices made by independent actors not before the courts and whose exercise of broad and legitimate discretion the courts cannot presume either to control or to predict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.