Denault v. Ahern’s Empirical Analysis
857 F.3d 76 · 2017
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City · United States v. Zannino · Manuel v. City of Joliet
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it clear that the object of th[e] [appellate] challenge was not presciently included in the itemized list of rulings appealed, we will have no jurisdiction to consider the challenge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“encompasses not only that judgment, but also all earlier interlocutory orders”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“designate the judgment, order, or part thereof being appealed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.