Armstrong v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3626 (§ 20409 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12131 (§ 201 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Turner v. Safley · Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co. · Thorpe v. Housing Authority of Durham · New York v. United States · Printz v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where the court supervises a continuing course of conduct and where as new facts develop additional supervisory action by the court is required, an appeal from the supervisory order does not divest the district court of jurisdiction to continue its supervision, even though in the course of that supervision the court acts upon or modifies the order from which the appeal is taken.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Oceana, Inc. v. Ross“a district court has continuing jurisdiction in support of its judgment, and until the judgment has been properly stayed or superseded, the district court may enforce it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Oceana, Inc. v. Ross“The district court may issue orders pending appeal to enforce its judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Oceana, Inc. v. Ross
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.