Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 857 So. 2d 1189 - State v. Barton

857 So. 2d 1189 - State v. Barton’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
November 2011
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Blockburger v. United States · Douglas v. Alabama · Whalen v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “test, commonly referred to as the Blockburger test, is taken from Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 304 , 52 S.Ct. 180, 182 , 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932) as follows: The applicable rule is that where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one, is whether each provision requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not. Accord, State v. Knowles, 392 So.2d 651, 654 (La.1980). The second test is the”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.