857 So. 2d 16 - State v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited
22 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Klopfer v. State of North Carolina · Beavers v. Haubert · 847 So. 2d 1198 - State v. Love · 376 So. 2d 136 - State v. Reaves
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Thus, . . . the proper approach to the question of whether the defendant's right to a speedy trial was violated is not merely a review of the dates and circumstances of the hearings, but an examination of the entire record in order to discern whether there was "palpable abuse" on the part of the trial court in granting the motion to quash.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage“Because of the complementary role of trial courts and appellate courts demands that deference be given to a trial court's discretionary decision, an appellate court is allowed to reverse a trial court judgment on a motion to quash only if that finding represents an abuse of the trial court's discretion.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.