Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 857 So. 2d 299 - Concepcion v. State

857 So. 2d 299 - Concepcion v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 365 So. 2d 701 - Castor v. State · State v. Delva · 684 So. 2d 736 - Chicone v. State · 64 So. 2d 915 - Gerds v. State · Davis v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`a) that the defendant knowingly purchased or possessed a certain substance, b) the substance was cocaine, c) the quantity was 28 grams or more, and d) the defendant knew the substance was cocaine.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Fundamental error occurs when a trial court fails to instruct a jury on an essential element of the crime charged. If the trial court issues an incomplete or inaccurate jury instruction, fundamental error may occur if the error relates to an element of the crime. However, in order for the error in the instruction to be fundamental, it must pertain to an element of the crime that is a disputed issue in the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Because Williams' jury may have been misled into thinking that it could convict him based solely on Adderly's conduct, we hold that the instructions were fundamental error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.