Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 857 So. 2d 861 - Wright v. State

857 So. 2d 861 - Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 66 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Apprendi v. New Jersey · United States v. Agurs · Kyles v. Whitley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he burden is on the defendant to demonstrate that the evidence he claims as Brady material satisfies each of these elements. Even where favorable evidence is suppressed, a new trial will not be necessary where it is determined that the favorable evidence did not result in prejudice.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “Habeas corpus should not be used as a vehicle for presenting issues which should have been raised at trial and on appeal or in postconviction proceedings.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “counsel actively represented conflicting interests and that an actual conflict of interest adversely affected his lawyer's performance.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.