Allen v. Redman’s Empirical Analysis
858 F.2d 1194 · 1988
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 2021
8 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Mullaney v. Wilbur · Engle v. Isaac · Cupp v. Naughten
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether, in Michigan, when the defendant introduces evidence of insanity, proof of sanity becomes an element of the offense charged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Messenger“upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt of every fact necessary to constitute the crime with which he is charged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[s]anity is nowhere mentioned in [Michigan’s] definition”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gall v. Parker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.