Conmar Corporation v. Mitsui & Company’s Empirical Analysis
858 F.2d 499 · 1988
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2018 · most notably Klehr v. Ao Smith Corporation Ao (1997), Eichman v. Fotomat Corp. (1989)
17 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 15B (Sherman Antitrust Act)
Relies on Bourjaily v. United States · Pinney Dock & Transport Co. v. Penn Central Corp. · Rosene v. United States · T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'n · Holloway v. Florida
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“excite[d] the inquiry of a reasonable person.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“had neither actual nor constructive knowledge”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“establish that [his] failure to have notice of [his] claim was the result of affirmative conduct by the defendant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.