Peone v. Regulus Stud Mills, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
858 F.2d 550 · 1988
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Ashton v. Cory · Sanchez v. Galey · Runcorn v. Shearer Lumber Products, Inc. · Peone v. Regulus Stud Mills, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Several criteria must, however, be met before negligence as a matter of law will be found. First, the statute or regulation must clearly define the required standard of conduct [citation omitted]; second, the statute or regulation must have been intended to prevent the type of harm defendant's act or omission caused [citation omitted]; third, the plaintiff must be a member of the class of persons the statute or regulation was designed to protect [citation omitted]; and fourth, the violation must have been a proximate cause of the injury [citation omitted].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“the owner or lessee of premises, or other person who is virtually the proprietor or operator of the business there carried on, but who, by reason of there being an independent contractor, or for any other reason, is not the direct employer of the workmen there employed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Ek v. Herrington
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.