Yonkers Racing Corp. v. City of Yonkers’s Empirical Analysis
858 F.2d 855 · 1988
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 87 later decisions — most recently December 2012 · most notably Ivy v. Diamond Shamrock Chemicals Co. (1993), United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters (1990)
31 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 22 U.S.C. § 2283 · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1443 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 2283 · 42 U.S.C. § 3601 (§ 801 of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968)) · 42 U.S.C. § 4321 (§ 2 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969)
Relies on Cantwell v. State of Connecticut · Wisconsin v. Yoder · Sherbert v. Verner · Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. Sheets · Brown v. Board of Education
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“removal was necessary to protect the integrity of the Consent Decree”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he power conferred by the [All Writs] Act extends, under appropriate circumstances, to persons who, though not parties to the original action or engaged in wrongdoing, are in a position to frustrate the implementation of a court order or the proper administration of justice....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“district court, in exceptional circumstances, may use its All Writs authority to remove an otherwise unremovable state court case in order to `effectuate and prevent the frustration of orders it has previously issued in its exercise of jurisdiction otherwise obtained'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.