Martin v. Duffy’s Empirical Analysis
858 F.3d 239 · 2017
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Estelle v. Gamble · Pearson v. Callahan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a plaintiff must allege that (1) he engaged in protected First Amendment activity, (2) the defendant took some action that adversely affected his First Amendment rights, and (3) there was a causal relationship between his protected activity and the defendant's conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Woolsey v. Ojeda“[A]n order that fails to explicitly address or dispose of all claims presented to the court may nevertheless qualify as a final, appealable order if [its] language ... is calculated to conclude all the claims before the district court....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a plaintiff suffers adverse action if the defendant's allegedly retaliatory conduct would likely deter 'a person of ordinary firmness' from the exercise of First Amendment rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Woolsey v. Ojeda
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.