United States v. Fields’s Empirical Analysis
858 F.3d 24 · 2017
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 641 (Livestock Fraud Protection Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 994
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Gall v. United States · United States v. Duarte · Cumpiano v. Banco Santander Puerto Rico · United States v. Martin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a factor already accounted for in the [S]entencing [G]uidelines,”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A district court's failure to docket, or even complete, an SOR 'does not require vacation of the sentence absent a showing of prejudice.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“First, we address those claims that affect the procedural integrity of the sentence. Second, we address any residual question as to the substantive reasonableness of the sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.