United States v. Libous’s Empirical Analysis
858 F.3d 64 · 2017
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 3556
Relies on United States v. Zizzo · Nelson v. Colorado · United States v. Pauline · United States v. Wright · United States v. Logal
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“his death abates not only the appeal but also all proceedings had in the prosecution [of the underlying indictment] from its inception,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“stand convicted without resolution of the merits of his appeal”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“at a minimum, the logic of Nelson strongly supports abating”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.