858 F. Supp. 747 - Johnson v. Runyon’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 791 · 29 U.S.C. § 794
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education · Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs · United States v. Alaska
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[e]ven if Johnson reasonably failed to receive notice of the time limit because she did not see posters at the South Suburban or Fox Valley facilities during her application process, Johnson received constructive notice when she worked at the O'Hare facility.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Johnson v. Runyon“did nothing to stand in the way of Johnson's filing a discrimination claim, nor has any evidence been proffered to show that the Postal Service actively misled her.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Johnson v. Runyon“despite due diligence ... [Johnson] was prevented by circumstances beyond ... her control from contacting the counselor within the time limits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Johnson v. Runyon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.