Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 858 P.2d 1012 - State v. James

State v. James’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
12
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2023

20 state decisions — followed in 12 states

901993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · California v. Trombetta · Oregon v. Elstad · Pennsylvania v. Muniz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Wle need not address the admissibility of the earlier statement because any error in that regard was harmless. The second, post-Miranda confession rendered the earlier statement unnecessary for the State's case because the second statement contained all the information in the first statement, as well as additional detail.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[wle are concerned that a separate state standard might generate confusion in this area.... Therefore, we decline at this time to develop a separate constitutional standard governing admissibility of confessions under the Utah Constitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “When statements obtained from a defendant after a Miranda waiver are deemed admissible, admission of earlier statements may constitute harmless error, if error at all.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.