Lassiter v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Neil v. Biggers · Rimmer v. State · Johnson v. Dugger · 629 So. 2d 238 - Scott v. State · 776 So. 2d 943 - Walker v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the opportunity of the witness to view the criminal at the time of the crime; (2) the witness's degree of attention; (3) the accuracy of the witness's prior description of the criminal; (4) the level of certainty demonstrated by the witness at the confrontation; and (5) the length of time between the crime and the confrontation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Alfonso v. State“based on the totality of the circumstances, the identification was reliable and there was no likelihood of irreparable misidentification.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Alfonso v. State“a substantial likelihood of irreparable [mis]identification.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Alfonso v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.