Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 858 SO2D 1173 - Thrasher v. Arida

Thrasher v. Arida’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Reid v. Barry · 782 So. 2d 417 - Kaplan v. Bayer · 805 So. 2d 22 - Bd. of Trustees v. Lost Tree Village Corp. · Barr v. Schlarb · Robb v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hen an agreement contains a latent ambiguity[,] . . . the issue of the correct interpretation of the agreement is an issue of fact which precludes -8- "A latent ambiguity in a deed description is said to exist when the deed, clear on its face, is shown by some extraneous fact to present an equivocation by being susceptible to two or more possible meanings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “consider the language of the entire instrument in order to determine the intent of the grantor, both as to the character of estate and the property conveyed and to so construe the instrument as if legally possible to effectuate such intent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]henever a party presents an arguable claim that a document contains a latent ambiguity, the court is obliged to consider the extrinsic evidence, at least to the extent necessary to determine whether the claimed latent ambiguity exists.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.