Denson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2011
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 503 So. 2d 803 - Wetz v. State · 716 So. 2d 1083 - Gleeton v. State · Franklin v. State · 787 So. 2d 1282 - Moore v. State · Jones v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] cautionary instruction is not absolutely required in every case involving the testimony of a [confidential informant], even when there is evidence of potential bias on the part of that witness in favor of the State; especially where the testimony of the witness finds corroboration in other evidence. In the case now before us, there was substantial evidence presented by the State, including an audiotape of the transaction, that corroborated much of the witness’s testimony, and we are satisfied that the court did not err when it refused the above-quoted instruction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stribling v. State“The Court instructs the jury that the law looks with suspicion and distrust on the testimony of an alleged accomplice or informant, and requires the jury to [weigh] that testimony with great care and suspicion. You should [weigh] the testimony from an alleged accomplice or informant, and passing on what weight, if any, you should give this testimony, you should [weigh] it with great care and caution, and look upon it with distrust and suspicion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stribling v. State“Moore deals strictly with the limited subject of uncorroborated testimony of jailhouse snitches. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.