Day v. Day’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 358 So. 2d 919 - Sims v. Sims · 332 So. 2d 834 - TL James & Co., Inc. v. Montgomery · 586 So. 2d 118 - Hare v. Hodgins · Smith v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company · McCarroll v. McCarroll
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Consequently, when the community is terminated, the employee's spouse is entitled to be recognized as the owner of the one-half of the value attributable to the pension or deferred compensation right earned during the existence of the community. When the community is terminated, each spouse becomes a fully vested co-owner in indivision of all property of the former community regime, including pension benefits acquired during the community.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.