858 So. 2d 982 - Fore v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2019
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 10 Cal. 4th 1114 - People v. Carbajal · 6 Cal. 4th 952 - People v. Crow · 223 Cal. App. 3d 606 - People v. Pitts · 101 Cal. App. 4th 155 - People v. Bernal · State v. Iniguez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“reflect the willingness of the People to accept that sum in satisfaction of the defendant's rehabilitative and deterrent debt to society.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he purpose of restitution is to make the victim whole with respect to the financial injury suffered as a result of the victim's crime”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[p]rivate parties cannot settle a civil claim and thereby agree to waive the subsequent application of the criminal statute”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.